Who killed Malcolm X?

Malcolm X was one of most influential faces in the history of Black Movements in USA. Unlike many leaders, most inspired by Martin Luther King, Malcolm X decided to step aside from the peaceful speeches to a more confrontational way, being associated with the Black Panther Party.

But before his public image, he was just a boy related to robbery and drug selling. In 1946 was imprisoned, and during the years in jail, he spent his time studying. He soon converted to the Nation of Islam, or Black Muslims. 

Once X was freed, Elijah Muhammad, leader of the Nation of Islam, was impressed by Malcolm's abilities and named him second-in-command. X saw Muhammad as a paternal and spiritual figure, but shortly after he figured out that the private life. Malcolm felt betrayed when he learnt that Muhammad had fathered six children with different women. He left the Nation of Islam and their relationship deteriorated further.

Malcolm X in Saudi Arabia

Compulsory for all muslims, he flew to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, in order to make the pilgrimage to Mecca, regarded as the holiest city of Islam. There he felt thrilled with the fact that people from all races were equal when they praised Allah. He changed his name to El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz, converted to the Sunni Islam, and returned to the US as a more moderate man.

But when he returned to the US, Malcolm received numerous death threats from the Nation of Islam, being February 21st, 1965, his last day. He was about to deliver a lecture at the Audubon Ballroom in Harlem, when followers of Elijah Muhammad shot dead Malcolm with pistols and gunshots.

Extract of the movie "Malcolm X"

Quotes, information used & further readings:

History in an Hour: Malcolm X

History News Network: Who Killed Malcolm X? And Why?

International Bussiness Times: Malcolm X the Muslim: A man Islam saved twice then killed

National Humanities Center: Islam in America: From African slaves to Malcolm X

racism still exist?

racism still exist?  

we learned a lot of how the afro american people fought for their rights, but were the civil movements the remedy to finish with discrimination?

something really interesting happened on July 17, 2014 and was the Eric Garner's death, a afro american man that was killed after that a police officer put him in a chokehold for 15 seconds, the officer make's compression in Eric's throat for about 15 seconds preventing him breath.

What was the reason for do it? 

Eric was selling cigarettes on the street and  was the reason to arrest him, but the arrest was a little violent and finished with his life.

I think that there is not reason for take someone's life and that's remember me so much the violent way that the policeman had at the moment to stop the civil movements. 

while eric was drowning said "I can't breathe" so if you put this on google or wherever social network you will find this because that was a controversial new arround the world.

We know that the movements and all the Martin Luther King's revolution was a long time ago, and also we know that the movements had a good results for finish with segregation and discrimination, but this happened one year ago so, even in this times exist the racism I think.

What do you think about this? 

Where are the non violent ways?

Here I will post the video with the moment that he said "I can't  breathe"

Segregation 2.0 in United States

We know about Martin Luther King Jr. and what he did "fighting" for the civil rights of afroamerican people and the things that we talked about the powerful anti-segregation movie “Selma”. But many experts feel specifically in segregation, that aimed to solve has only worsened.




According to the Civil Rights Project of Harvard University, the annulment of segregation in the United States had its peak in 1980's, but since then, there places more segregated, one reason may be because exist changes in the common residence places of the African American people, the continued growth in suburbs and the new communities around the country, but it is also said that even now  has more to do with social and economic differences in states than with the racial discrimination like in the past.


In the main points of Understanding dominant-minority relations in the united states today (Part 3 - Charper 5) it said: 


"at the beginning of the 20th century, the racial oppression of african americans took the form of a rigid competitive system of group relations and de jure(*) segregation. *segregation that is imposed by law
"Compared with their situation at the start of the 20th century, Today, African Americans have made considerable improvements in quality of life. But the distance to true racial equality remains enormous"




Also, Theguardian.com in one of its opinion column said :

 
"Segregation in the 21st century is not just about being legally and physically separated, but about a cultural separation that still feels like it divides more than it binds"




Now, with unintentionally misinterpret about what we learned and discussed in class, I propose the following idea. After everything that happened in the history of civil rights, slavery, the inequality that afroamerican people had in the past and new features that caused this "new" segregation. Who really is being segregated? Is still exist "whites only" signs that cause this? White people can also be segregated by african americans? self-segregation exists?  

Now you, dear classmates, students of the XXI century, who know the events occurring around this theme... I know, are a lot of questions, but What can you said about this?

I will be happy to answer any questions or comments.

Racism in Australia

While I was searching some information about Aboriginal people in Australia I found some shocking information that I thought it could be something we should talk about. 

According to this site:  

-1 in 5 people living in Australia was a target of racial discrimination (around 4.6 million people).

-3 in 4 Indigenous Australians regularly experience racism.

-Nearly half of all Australian residents from a culturally and linguistically diverse background have experienced racism at some time in their life.

Now, we can generalize and say that all Australians are racist, because they're not. In fact, If some people see some of these actions they’ll be disgusted and against it. However, the numbers are kind of disconcerting seeing that immigrants are a significant part of the population, as well as the aboriginal people. And it isn’t something that only happens in Australia, we can see it all around the world. Even in our country, there are some people, who may make awful remarks towards Mapuche descendants, Peruvians, Bolivians, etc. Just because of their place of origin.

In my opinion, racism is a difficult subject because not everyone sees it the same way. Some people make racism comments without knowing or are blind to what is happening around them. However, that doesn’t mean we can’t change it. It’s our responsibility to educate ourselves, think every time we speak and put ourselves on the other’s shoes. If we hear or experience something like that we, as teachers, need to correct the other person and make them see the wrong of his actions.

Here are some videos of some situations in Australia.

So, what do you think? Do you think this numbers or images are normal or justified? 

References:

 http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-28192696

http://alltogethernow.org.au/news/how-address-denial-racism/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2709148/Half-Australians-racist-Aborigines-one-five-away-public-transport.html

Languages in Australia

Cultural diversity in Australia has made that in the country are spoken more than 200 languages but, English is the official language in the country. The most widely spoken languages are: Italian, Greek, Cantonese, Arabic, Mandarin, Vietnamese, Spanish, Filipino, German and Hindi. Much of these languages spoken in this country are spoken by immigrants from around the world, the rest of these many languages are spoken by indigenous Australians and Torres Strait Islander, “more than 60 different languages are spoken by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians.”

The Australians are characterized for shortening some words, for example for "football" they say “footy", for "barbecue" they say "barbie", for "TV" they say "telly", etc.

Something very interesting about this country is the help they give to the immigrants who do not speak English or do not have a very well English because the country has created different programs for immigrants. These programs were created for a better quality of life for them, which consist of free English classes. Some of the programs that Australia has are the following:

            - Adult Migrant English Program

            - Language, Literacy and Numeracy Program

            - Workplace English Language and Literacy Program

            - English as a Second Language New Arrivals Program

Interpreter Symbol

For the Australian government is important that immigrants who do not speak the language can communicate in a good way, for this reason they created a system of interpretation which is that in different parts of the country there are interpreters who can help people who do not know much English. To find out which sites are interpreters has created a symbol then people can easily know where they can turn to and communicate in a good way

What do you think about that?

Would you like something similar in Chile?

http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/0/D696154A0D5CBBE3CA2570DE0006ED55?opendocument

http://www.education.gov.au/amep

https://www.immi.gov.au/living-in-australia/help-with-english/NIS/